Why 70% of Software Revenue Still Lives On-Prem and Why That Changes Everything

For all the attention cloud growth receives, the real engine of enterprise software remains largely unchanged. Roughly 70% of software revenue still comes from on-premises deployments—quietly funding innovation, margins, and customer relationships. Yet many vendors continue to design strategy around the fastest-growing slice of the market rather than the largest one. This article examines why the installed base still matters, what it reveals about customer behavior, and how recognizing this reality reshapes growth strategy.

For more than a decade, enterprise software strategy has been dominated by a single narrative: cloud is the future. Earnings calls, investor decks, and product roadmaps all reinforce the same assumption—that growth lives almost exclusively in SaaS, and everything else is legacy drag.

Yet the numbers tell a very different story.

Roughly 70% of enterprise software revenue still comes from on-premises deployments, while only 11–31% represents net-new cloud growth, depending on category. This is not a rounding error. It is the economic engine that funds R&D, pays sales teams, and sustains customer relationships.

The strategic mistake many vendors make is designing for the growth narrative while neglecting the revenue reality. And that disconnect is reshaping the competitive landscape.

Market Context: Deployment Split and Legacy Installed Base

The enterprise software market is not divided into “cloud” and “obsolete.” It is divided into installed base and net-new adoption.

On-prem systems dominate industries where data sensitivity, regulatory oversight, latency requirements, or operational complexity are non-negotiable—financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, government, and critical infrastructure. These environments are not slow to modernize; they are selective.

The result is a deployment split where cloud adoption grows rapidly in percentage terms, but on-prem revenue remains structurally durable. Maintenance contracts, expansion licenses, support services, and compliance-driven upgrades continue to generate predictable cash flow.

This installed base is not frozen in time. It evolves incrementally, absorbing new capabilities while maintaining architectural control. Vendors who misclassify it as “legacy” often find themselves disrupted—not by cloud-native competitors, but by peers who respect the economics of reality.

Finding 1: The Economic Gravity of the Installed Base

Installed base revenue has gravity. It pulls strategy, pricing, and product decisions toward it whether leadership acknowledges it or not.

Most enterprise vendors still derive the majority of operating margin from on-prem customers. These customers fund experimentation, acquisitions, and cloud investments. Yet paradoxically, they are often underserved—forced into support models designed for decline rather than optimization.

Ignoring this gravity leads to predictable failure modes:

  • Underinvestment in deployment efficiency and lifecycle management
  • Customer resentment from forced migrations
  • Margin erosion disguised as “transformation costs”

The installed base is not a blocker to growth. It is the financial substrate of growth.

Finding 2: Customer Drivers of On-Prem Demand: Compliance, Control, and Customization

Customers are not irrationally resisting the cloud. They are making rational trade-offs.

On-prem deployments persist because they solve real problems:

  • Compliance and data residency requirements that cloud regions cannot fully address
  • Operational control over performance, uptime, and upgrade timing
  • Deep customization aligned to business-critical workflows

For these organizations, the cost of disruption outweighs the promise of elasticity. Cloud becomes one tool among many—not a universal endpoint.

Vendors who frame on-prem demand as “technical debt” miss the strategic intent behind customer decisions.

Finding 3: Coexisting Priorities: Compliance, Optimization, and Customer Success

A common misconception is that vendors must choose between:

  • Compliance and innovation
  • On-prem and cloud
  • Support and customer success

In reality, these priorities must coexist.

High-performing vendors design operating models where:

  • Compliance enables trust rather than slowing delivery
  • Optimization improves margins on existing revenue
  • Customer success applies equally to on-prem and hybrid environments

Customer success does not replace support; it builds on it. Optimization does not eliminate compliance; it operationalizes it.

The future is not a clean break. It is layered.

Finding 4: Hybrid and Transitional Models: The Market’s Reality

Transitional models are not a stepping stone. They are the market.

Hybrid licensing, managed on-prem, private cloud, edge deployments, and consumption-based pricing for installed systems are not compromises—they are strategic responses to real demand.

Vendors winning today are not forcing customers to choose sides. They are enabling gradual evolution, preserving customer value while expanding optionality.

The fastest-growing cloud businesses are often those that respect on-prem realities, not those that dismiss them.

Implications for Vendors: Rethinking Growth Strategies

The most dangerous assumption in enterprise software today is that growth strategy and revenue strategy can be separated.

Designing exclusively for the 11–31% growth segment while neglecting the 70% that funds the business creates fragility, not focus. It weakens customer trust, destabilizes margins, and opens the door to competitors who understand transitional economics.

The real opportunity lies in alignment:

  • Treat installed base as a strategic asset, not a liability
  • Build operating models where cloud, on-prem, and hybrid reinforce each other
  • Optimize for coexistence, not replacement

The future of enterprise software is not purely cloud-native or purely legacy. It is economically grounded, operationally hybrid, and strategically transitional.

And the vendors who recognize that will define the next decade of the market.

Related Insisghts

No items found.